Well, it’s happening (at least the latter). Organizations are starting to experiment with the idea of invading the digital privacy of would-be employees — in the case of the B.C. NDP party, leadership candidates. The party is apparently planning an exhaustive risk assessment of people who are committed to their cause.

This is the kind of slippery slope that, if taken, will marginalize political parties and will discourage some of the best candidates; not because of a photo, video or blog post (all of which can be found in plain view online) but because none of the good candidates are likely to endorse big brother tactics. Not without risking the suggestion they endorse that approach.

The people most successful with social media, mix their personal and professional lives into something of a personal brand. They know how to communicate and engage, even galvanize, their public using a personal digital account. They may have even gained some experience navigating the sometimes-stormy seas of social media.

Politicians — well, all of us — have been making public mistakes without Facebook since the dawn of civilization. The true sign of a leader isn’t his or her freedom from life experiences, but their ability to lead through any situation no matter how bad and still galvanize the support of their community.

Besides, it’s more likely your missteps will be captured and shared by someone else.

I spoke about this very topic with Dan Matheson on CTV’s Power Play earlier this evening. Click here to see the video.

I graduated from Wilfrid Laurier University in 1992 with a B.A. in Communication Studies and followed it up with a one-year post-graduate certificate program in PR at Humber College. My experience at university taught me how to think, while my year at Humber really taught me how to apply my thinking and do something with what I knew.

I entered the workforce in 1993 and landed my first full-time gig at Fleishman-Hillard (FH) Canada, an international PR firm that had just launched a Toronto office. I was hire #8, if memory serves me correctly.

I was keen. Energetic. Learning all the time. You know what. I still am, largely because of the path my career has taken. When I started at FH there was this “new thing” called the Internet. I was “voluntold” to go learn about it at our world headquarters. What a cool opportunity for a 24-year old. I got hooked. The early Internet adopters in the PR industry were far and few between. By age 28, I was a true Internet PR pioneer and had some incredible perspective and expertise.

The pace of my career development hasn’t slowed down. I left FH to work at Canada’s largest PR agency at the time, NATIONAL. The PR industry still wasn’t ready for the Web, so I spent a couple of years on the ad side of the business where interactive was rocking. I learned so much in that experience. I learned that I was ultimately a communications professional, not an ad guy. I migrated back to PR, working at NATIONAL again and then iStudio, a web communications agency. I found my home.

After six years I left “home” for the streets of New York where I returned to FH after more than a decade. I was given the opportunity to launch a digital, social and emerging media practice in the most marketing-savvy place in the world. I rocked NYC. I think there’s an old Sinatra song about it.

Old-school

So why am I writing about this today? Well, the kind folks at Humber College (actually, the students that occupy the seats I did 17+ years ago) have invited me to join a panel exploring the future of PR and social media. It should be fun. [photo: I am on the far right in this picture. Click on it for more images of the era].

My advice to the professionals of tomorrow?

Never stop learning

The next generation of PR professionals is entering the industry at a time of great turbulence and opportunity. It’s exciting and unpredictable.

PR is being reinvented

It’s not just PR that’s changing. Marketing is going through unprecedented change too. Chances are what you’re discussing in the classroom today will be a solid foundation but not necessarily a road map for your career.

Be courteous and creative on the job search

Last year at Personal Brand Camp, one of the comments I suggested was to deliver “personalized introductions and creative thank you’s.” There are many people competing for jobs and employers are becoming more specific in the desired skill set for new employees. A personalized introduction shows what you know about the company and the person hiring and effectively communicates why you’re a great fit. Be passionate. Be smart. A creative thank you reinforces your strengths, shows what you can do and catches the attention of the person making the hire.

Stay connected

Your classmates will do some exciting things. Social platforms allow you to stay connected and continue learning from each other. Share your experience. Ask your friends for advice. Introduce each other to new connections and invite each other to cool events.

Stay current

In turbulent times you need to keep your ear to the ground. Figure out how to stay on top of the trends relevant to where you are working or want to work.

Work is life, but work to live

If you’re working in social or digital worlds, it’s a 24/7 world. People struggle to find work life balance. Some argue that there’s no such thing any more. There is, but you need to figure out how much you’re willing to work and learn, and when you need to make time for yourself. You’ll figure it out. Ask others how they manage it.

So, those are some thoughts. Careers can be totally predictable or completely unpredictable. It depends on your personality. I like mine to be predictably unpredictable, especially leading the charge in digital and social. Predictability results in complacency.

How do you react to this? What other tips or advice would you offer? Leave a comment below.

There’s nothing stopping any organization from becoming social media friendly.

Social media engagement can be active or passive. Active organizations get right in there. Brand advocates participate in the conversation and become recognize contributors to the community. Social channels are both an input and output, used to help shape the message and build relevance. Passive organizations on the other hand use social media primarily as a listening mechanism. The insights gleaned from the conversation and community activity are used to shape communications and shared content.

Almost every organization has a communication function. Today, effective communication is influenced more than ever before by the inputs of the community. Customers, consumers, employees and business partners share thoughts and ideas that are top of mind. Their opinions offer context. Organizations that listen to social media and other channels of input can leverage insights gained to shape truly targeted, useful and relevant content. Package in the right format, this information is easily shared and woven into the conversations that surround an organization or brand.

We call this being social media friendly. Any organization can be social media friendly if it’s people take the time to listen and craft great content.

Catone suggests, “The number one rule when responding to all criticism, even the negative type, is to stay positive. Adding more negativity to the conversation by letting yourself be drawn into a fight with a customer or user will only reflect poorly on your business.”

The one item that I’d suggest adding one other consideration, especially for the small and medium sized businesses who comprise the core of OPEN Forum, is evaluating risk. While customer engagement and service is important, small business owners often need to focus on their core offering. Few companies have the resources to respond to all feedback. When a company evaluates risk, they assess the potential influence of those generating feedback and the anticipated negative impact or fallout. The greater the influence or impact, the higher the risk and the greater the need to engage.

The final important point is something I learned early on. If you have a problem with someone, try to deal with it in private. Most companies want to migrate feedback to more intimate and controllable channels where a frank dialogue and resolution can emerge. If the resolution is satisfactory, often those sharing feedback will update their friends or followers on the experience.

People today want to support responsive companies that respect their opinion and want to improve the way they do business.

NBC Olympics TeamUSA SocialStream on iPhone

Much of the buzz surrounding the Winter Olympics in Vancouver this month has been on how different the media landscape is, especially with citizen journalism and social media driving much of the coverage. There is a groundswell though on the mobile front that excites me.

News and event applications for the Olympics
I have been exploring some of the applications available to iPhone users via the iTunes app store. Some of the apps I have dowloaded include news and information apps from CTV (Canada’s national broadcast sponsor), Bell (Canada’s telco sponsor) and for a U.S. perspective, NBC in partnership with AT&T (a Fleishman-Hillard client).

There are some obvious similarities:

• News and updates
• Athlete profiles
• Medal standings
• Venue information
• Event schedules (sports and cultural)

NBC offers the most engaging content
In my opinion, NBC stands out as the best. Why? It includes a one-stop shop for some pretty fascinating updates from U.S. athletes via Twitter, based on the Olympic Pulse Tweet Sheet.

Bell Winter Olympics Digital Visitor Guide on iPhone

The Bell application also references Twitter, but does stream the content. Instead it provides users with links to some recommended Twitter profiles related to the Games. The application also is really just a mobile interface to pull content from the mobile version of the Bell’s Vancouver 2010 website. Bell also provides consumers with a fun, free cowbell app and a virtual torch based on Bombardier’s (a Fleishman-Hillard client) torch design.

The CTV application is good for ongoing news updates, but is a little light in its overall functionality. I like the experience of the ctvolympics.ca site much better.

There has been a fair bit of discussion online over the last month about Google Sidewiki. This technology allows anyone with the current version of the Google Toolbar to leave comments on any Web site. Think of it as graffiti. Some people will try to beautify a site and make it better with their inputs. Others will try to defame the existing content. It could create a potentially polarized view from the communities of allies and adversaries that visit a Web site.

So what does this mean for communication professionals? As the guardians of reputations online and offline, we need to ensure that those policing the brand and concerned with reputation are aware of these types of developments. Sidewiki brings the conversation home. No longer do we need to just monitor the conversation in  social media venues. We need to monitor the conversation on our own site’s Sidewiki.

There are a number of things we can do to take control. This list is inspired by five steps (hover over links for quick summary – 1, 2, 3, 4, 5) proposed by Tom Barnes earlier today on Twitter.

1. Download the Google Toolbar with Sidewiki and check out your clients’ Web site(s). Is there any conversation there that they should be aware of?
2. Learn about this new technology and its potential impact on online reputation management.
3. Encourage the Web team to take ownership of your domain(s) and set up those responsible for reputation management as the Page owner.
4. Once ownership is secured, insert a Page owner’s welcome message to set the tone and reinforce any terms, site usage standards or policies related to how conversation and interaction fits into the Web site. (see Ed Lee’s post linked below for some great recommendations)
5. Update your reputation management plan to account for online threats and opportunities represented by evolving technology platforms and social media.If you don’t have a plan, develop one!
6. Put the plan into action.

Here’s a good primer video from Google called Introducing Google Sidewiki.

Here are some other posts you may want to check out:

• Jeremiah Owyang’s overview
• Neville Hobson’s overview
• Ed Lee’s overview
• PRNewser’s overview (including comments from @dbradfield)

I hope you find this helpful.

“The reality is that the people who can get excitement going about music these days aren’t in the record industry at all, but rather all around it.”

Social Media Week is upon us here in New York. Our team is excited to play a role in this first ever event and get out to do some real networking.

So much of our social media consulting at Fleishman-Hillard is devoted to helping organizations understand and adapt to the conversation that surrounds. Some of the common questions we get include:

• How are we being talked about online?
• How much influence does social media have?
• How do we integrate social content into our marketing and communication programs?
• Can we take control of the situation?
• How do we know of we’re having an impact?

These types of questions inspired the topic of our “sold out” roundtable session being hosted at Fleishman-Hillard this evening, “When Social Media Becomes Unsociable“. More often than not, the phone rings for us when you know what hits the fan. As companies adapt to and accept the influence of unfiltered customer opinions syndicated via social media, they must decide how to engage. Even what appear to be the best plans can backfire in an uncontrolled environment like the blogosphere. Things can appear to be unsociable.

So what can your organization do? Well, be sure to check it at our event at http://justin.tv/FleishmanHillard at 4:30 p.m. this afternoon. You can also follow our tweets by tracking #SMWNY.

I plan on asking our panel some of the following questions:

• Have we entered the era of unsociable media?
• What is the role of social media in modern marketing?
• What does it take to be successful in social media?
• Where is social media going?
• What do you do when the conversation turns sour?

If you have any additional questions, shoot me an email, leave them in the comments section on this post or reply to me on Twitter (@dbradfield).